The Mantle Of Authority by General Chester Phillips, US Army (Retired) is a book that can be read as part of Book Club. It is Steve's selection, discussed at the fourth meeting.
Text[]
Chapter 4 (excerpt)
As I have shown in previous chapters, General Custer did not just lead from the front, but from the tip of the spear. This relentless glory-seeking has no place in today’s Army, of course--nor waging war upon a civilian populace. His recklessness doomed his soldiers.
General Washington led from the top. Nevertheless, applying a classic hierarchical structure to a volunteer army creates its own difficulties. Only General Washington’s personal engagement with his subordinates combined with the “home ground” focus of the Continental Army allowed for his success.
How can we explain the leadership style of Captain Steve Rogers? Yes, he did personally engage in combat with the enemy, but never for personal glory. Countless after-action reports show Captain Rogers reinforcing a wavering battle line or leading a stalled push to inspire his fellow soldiers.
On longer duration assignments involving battalion command, Captain Rogers directed his soldiers from the center. Trust in his soldiers and encouraging some autonomy allowed elements to operate independently, while still working toward the battalion’s overall goal. It is my firm belief that this form of leadership is not limited to Captain Rogers, but can be replicated in government, military, or private industry...